|
|
Home This site is an EPSRC funded public awareness project |
Further reading Biopsy techniques F. Burbank (1997). Stereotactic breast biopsy of atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ lesions: improved accuracy with directional, vacuum-assisted biopsy. Radiology, 202: 843-847. V. P. Jackson, and H. E. Reynolds (1991). Stereotaxic needle-core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytologic evaluation of nonpalpable breast lesions. Radiology, 181: 633-634. J. P. L. Whitlock, A. J. Evans, H. C. Burrell, S. E. Pinder, I. O. Ellis, R. W. Blamey, and A. R. M. Wilson (2000). Digital imaging improves upright stereotactic core biopsy of mammographic microcalcifications. Clinical Radiology, 55 (5): 374-377. Breast MRI P. J. Drew, S. Chatterjee, L. W. Turnbull, J. Read, P. J. Carleton, J. N. Fox, J. R Monson, and M. J. Kerin (1999). Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the breast is superior to triple assessment for the pre-operative detection of multifocal breast cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 6: 599-603. Breast ultrasound W. L. Teh, A. R. Wilson, A. J. Evans, H. Burrell, S. E. Pinder, and I. O. Ellis (2000). Ultrasound guided core biopsy of suspicious mammographic calcifications using high frequency and power Doppler ultrasound. Clinical Radiology, 55 (5): 390-394. Computer-aided detection L. J. Warren Burhenne, S. A. Wood, C. J. D'Orsi, S. A. Feig, D. B. Kopans, K. F. O'Shaughnessy, E. A. Sickles, L. Tabar, C. J. Vyborny, and R. A. Castellino (2000). Potential Contribution of computer-aided detection to the Sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology, 215: 554-562. Digital imaging N. H. Strickland (1996). Review article: some cost-benefit considerations for PACS: a radiological perspective. British Journal of Radiology, 69 (828): 1089-1098. Image registration E. R. Denton, L. I. Sonoda, D. Rueckert, S. C. Rankin, C. Hayes, M. O. Leach, D. L. Hill and D. J. Hawkes (1999). Comparison and evaluation of rigid, affine, and nonrigid registration of breast MR images. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 23 (5): 800-805. Screening practices E. D. Anderson, B. B. Muir, J. S. Walsh, and A. E. Kirkpatrick (1994). The efficacy of double reading mammograms in breast screening. Clinical Radiology, 49 (4): 248-251. R. G. Blanks, R. M. Given-Wilson, and S. M. Moss (1998). Efficiency of cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening: two versus one view mammography. Journal of Medical Screening, 5 (3): 141-145. P. Forrest (1986). Breast cancer screening. Report to the health ministers of England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. London: HMSO; 1986. |